HomeFeatured News2024 movie sequels, ranked: Were any of them necessary?

2024 movie sequels, ranked: Were any of them necessary?

100%
Skill name


In Hollywood, the query “Does this film franchise want one other chapter?” appears to have a reasonably straightforward reply: “Certain, if we predict it’ll nonetheless make cash!”

For followers of a given franchise, although, the calculations are extra sophisticated. Will that new installment in a film sequence truly add something worthwhile to the story, or simply undermine the franchise’s authentic successes? Can we truly need to know extra about our favourite characters, or will prequels and spinoffs destroy them? Do we’ve any purpose to consider the most recent film utilizing a well-recognized IP has a purpose to exist that isn’t fully mercenary? Will it at the least be some huge dumb enjoyable?

Whereas loads of 2024’s would-be IP blockbusters have shifted to 2025 dates, the yr to this point has nonetheless seen its share of sequels, prequels, and spinoffs. So we’re working the numbers, rating the yr’s latest-in-a-series films by how effectively they justify their existence — each as films, and as installments in ongoing tales.

16. The Strangers: Chapter 1

A man with his back to the camera holds a shotgun to the face of a person in a stylized female mask in the woods at night in The Strangers: Chapter 1

Picture: Lionsgate Movies/Everett Assortment

A remake of 2008’s home-invasion horror film The Strangers wasn’t obligatory, nevertheless it may have been good: With a premise as strong gold as “masked strangers break right into a distant dwelling and kill the couple vacationing there,” there are 1,000,000 completely different takes that might have been nice horror fodder that doesn’t comply with the unique film beat for beat. Sadly, that’s precisely the uninspired method director Renny Harlin (Die Arduous 2) takes with this film, the primary in a deliberate trilogy that was initially written as one huge four-hour-plus film, till Legendary Leisure broke it down into chunks.

This new batch of Strangers films is supposed to comply with the characters within the aftermath of this preliminary dwelling invasion. However it kicks off with Harlin basically remaking the primary Strangers with much less type and dread. Gone is the gradual creepiness of the unique film, changed by rushed horror sequences and some moments of lackluster motion. Whereas it’s attainable that components 2 and three one way or the other redeem the kickoff, Chapter 1 is nothing greater than a considerably worse retread of an efficient shocker. —Austen Goslin

A man in a black Spider-Man-esque costume stands atop a building looking down, noticeably not-quite-blocking a Calvin Klein billboard on the building behind him, in Madame Web

Picture: Columbia Footage/Everett Assortment

Madame Net is just loosely linked to Sony’s already loosely linked universe of Marvel characters. Ironic, provided that the tagline “Her internet connects all of them” was the central focus of all of the teasers. The one factor this affords to longtime followers of the present live-action Spider-Man narrative is a tease about Peter Parker’s existence — one thing that’s all the time been a giant query mark within the Sony Marvel films. Paramedic Cassie Webb (Dakota Johnson) is buddies with Peter’s (sizzling, younger, not but useless in a morally instructive method) Uncle Ben, in any case! Besides the movie by no means truly acknowledges that Ben’s new child nephew is Peter Parker, to the purpose the place holding again on that element turns into one thing like a bit. It’s virtually pandering, however not indulgent sufficient to really feel fulfilling in any respect.

With its stilted dialogue and nonsensical plot, Madame Net is just not a very good film in any respect. No less than it’s the type of horrible film that’s enjoyable to observe in a gaggle setting, whereas making jokes and tuning out the slower bits? It’s roughly Cats for superhero followers. —Petrana Radulovic

Finn Wolfhard in a Ghostbusters uniform looking at slime coming from the ceiling while Kamail Nanjiani, Logan Kim, Paul Rudd, and Celeste O’Connor stand behind him in Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire

Photograph: Sony Footage

This sequel to a sequelish reboot brings the brand new era of Ghostbusters (Paul Rudd, Carrie Coon, Finn Wolfhard, Mckenna Grace, and so forth.) again to New York, and brings again the unique characters (Invoice Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson, Annie Potts, and so forth.) for greater than a glorified cameo. That may be sufficient to make it important for superfans, however for everybody else, it’s a nostalgic callback to the unique film with not a lot new or participating to make it stand out, aside from Grace’s character’s maybe-queer storyline with a cute ghost lady. —PR

Bald, pointy-nosed former supervillain Gru (voiced by Steve Carell) stands at a crowded gathering wearing a “Hello, my name is” nametag and scowls at former classmate Maxime Le Mal (voiced by Will Ferrell), a skinny man with a gigantic poof of hair and a shiny gold-and-green puffy coat in Despicable Me 4

Picture: Common Footage / Everett Assortment

Nobody within the Despicable Me films appears to age. Former supervillain Gru (Steve Carell) appears to be like identical to he did within the first film, and so do his daughters, who’ve been youngsters for 14 years now. And but one way or the other, Gru and his spouse Lucy (Kristen Wiig) pursued a relationship, received married, and had a child. So at the least there’s some sense of time passing, even when it looks as if Gru Jr. may be an toddler for the following decade of sequels.

Despicable Me 4 contributes a couple of enjoyable new world-building parts to the franchise, although it sadly doesn’t discover them sufficient to make them important. Nonetheless, a few of them may set the stage for future adventures. (A complete college for villains?) This installment additionally provides a small however completely hilarious element to Gru’s previous, a backstory involving a highschool expertise present and the music “Karma Chameleon.” Nothing about Despicable Me 4 is crucial, nevertheless it’s cool to see a couple of extra funky particulars about this broadly outlined world. —PR

Martin Lawrence makes a really weird “I gotta poop” face, lips pressed together, cheeks puffed out, sweat on his forehead, and one eye squinted as he looks over at Will Smith in Bad Boys: Ride or Die

Picture: Columbia Footage/Everett Assortment

The fourth entry within the sequence Michael Bay inadvertently kicked off along with his directorial debut Dangerous Boys again in 1995 brings again a whole lot of forged members — mainly the Dangerous Boys themselves, Will Smith and Martin Lawrence. However the filmmakers clearly suppose Dangerous Boys followers need much more continuity than that. Screenwriters Chris Bremner and Will Beall do their finest to construct a Quick & Livid-style Dangerous Boys universe out of each little bit of character work and villain lore they’ll scrap collectively from the earlier three films.

That isn’t a praise. The place so many blockbuster films undergo as a result of the studio is attempting to launch a worthwhile franchise as an alternative of telling a good story, Experience or Die assumes viewers are coming to the theater armed with nostalgia and a detail-oriented fascination with lore, reasonably than simply desirous to see a few gifted comedic actors mouth off at one another between frenetic motion sequences. Followers who care deeply concerning the posthumous legacy of Joe Pantoliano’s character, that is your film. However largely, the franchise-building will get in the way in which of the enjoyable. —TR

A close-up shot of a man staring at an eyeless alien creature with bared teeth and a drool-covered chin in Alien: Romulus.

Picture: twentieth Century Studios

Fede Álvarez’s 2024 installment within the Alien franchise is sort of perversely outlined by how a lot it copies from previous Alien films, and the way little it provides to the canon: Álvarez and co-writer Rodo Sayagues can’t even conjure up their very own catchphrase, and fall again on having a brand new character echo the sequence’ most well-known line.

The movie is successfully creepy as a stand-alone, and for viewers who’ve by no means seen an Alien film, this may all be new, thrilling horror fare. However it’d nonetheless come throughout as a bit underexplained, since this movie is aimed immediately at individuals who know the franchise ahead and backward. It’s a greatest-hits montage, roughly: Bear in mind how creepy Xenomorphs are in water? Let’s try this once more. Chestbursters, facehuggers, Giger-esque genital imagery, evil androids suborning ships for the corporate — that was cool! Extra of that! And so forth. It’s a very good time on the films, nevertheless it may hardly be much less important. —TR

Noa (a chimp) and Raka (an orangutan) from Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes look at each other while Noa holds a weapon

Picture: twentieth Century Studios

The fourth within the new-era Planet of the Apes films (and the tenth Apes film should you batch all of them collectively) doesn’t add a lot to the franchise’s ongoing narrative — it jumps the story ahead in time about 300 years for a narrative that’s frustratingly half-baked and surprisingly acquainted from the earlier entry, Warfare for the Planet of the Apes, however with a gorilla dictator working a compelled work camp as an alternative of a human one. There are some highly effective concepts at work — that historical past repeats itself, that communities are stronger than people, and that these communities have to band collectively to withstand tyrants — however they aren’t communicated significantly clearly, particularly since they’re blended in with different threads, a couple of private journey undercut by each Kingdom advert, and concerning the unreliability and unknowability of humanity.

Kingdom is satisfying sufficient within the second, an motion blockbuster with spectacular visible results and a few interesting characters. It isn’t a nasty or boring entry within the sequence. It simply by no means feels important, or prefer it’s doing a lot apart from echoing extra propulsive, dynamic earlier entries on this run on the Apes story. —TR

Godzilla and King Kong roar at the sky together in Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire

Picture: Warner Bros. Footage

Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire feels just like the film the place the brand new MonsterVerse franchise hit its stride. Whereas 2014’s Godzilla evenly parodies catastrophe films and 2017’s Kong: Cranium Island does the identical for darkish conflict films, Godzilla x Kong is a buddy film a couple of large ape and a nuclear lizard who don’t like one another a lot, however are sometimes compelled to crew as much as struggle greater monsters. It’s inescapably dumb and uncomplicatedly entertaining.

However what makes this franchise particularly enjoyable proper now could be that it has a secret weapon: tv. Whereas the massive display screen is reserved for foolish monster brawls, the MonsterVerse’s TV present, Monarch: Legacy of Monsters, is a way more reserved, character-focused household drama that looks like an old-school journey film with large monsters thrown in. It’s a superb counterbalance to the foolish enjoyable of films like A New Empire, with the added bonus that the film’s story probably means Kong shall be within the present’s subsequent season. The MonsterVerse is an odd franchise, however so long as each entry retains proving itself entertaining, it’s awfully exhausting to complain. —AG

Po the panda (Jack Black) and Zhen the gray fox (Awkwafina) stand on the deck of a ship, both open-mouthed-smiling, in Kung Fu Panda 4

Picture: Common Footage/Everett Assortment

The adventures of panda kung fu grasp Po (Jack Black) may’ve been wrapped up within the sequence’ third installment again in 2016, however Kung Fu Panda 4 provides a little bit of a postscript. The door is now open for an additional unlikely hero to take over the franchise, ought to DreamWorks resolve to go that route: Mainly, Po will ultimately retire from his title because the Dragon Warrior, and a protégé will take up the mantle. (That undoubtedly isn’t the way it labored within the first film, however I digress.) His inheritor obvious, the sneaky, thieving fox Zhen (Awkwafina), is definitely a reasonably cool character. I wouldn’t be too mad seeing extra of her!

For the fourth film in an animated sequence, Kung Fu Panda 4 is decently satisfying, largely affected by wasted potential. However the struggle scenes are nonetheless cool, and the humor is humorous sufficient, even when it by no means reaches the highs of the originals. —PR

A pale woman (Nell Tiger Free) with deeply shadowed eyes lies on her back on a bed amid crumpled sheets, long black hair fanning around her head in a dark sunburst in The First Omen

Picture: twentieth Century Studios/Everett Assortment

The First Omen is an advanced addition to this checklist. On the one hand, it isn’t obligatory, actually. And its worst moments come on the shut of the film, when the implied connections to the unique movie sequence are made much more express than they already had been. The First Omen does, nevertheless, earn its place on this checklist by way of a wholly completely different model of this metric: It’d simply be one of the best film within the Omen sequence, which makes it a necessity by default.

Even higher, by making a film this scary, director and co-writer Arkasha Stevenson (Model New Cherry Taste) truly retroactively improves the remainder of Damien’s story, simply by making his origins this disturbing. The First Omen is just a superb horror film, and that’s greater than we are able to say for many franchise entries on this checklist, which is precisely why it clawed its method close to the highest. —AG

Ultraman, a robotic figure with huge, round, glowing blue eyes and a central head-fin, rears back to throw a spinning, circular, blue, glowing energy blade as he stands silhouetted against a fan of red and orange color in Ultraman: Rising

Picture: Netflix

Netflix’s animated Ultraman film isn’t following a strict franchise continuity like so most of the sequels, prequels, and spinoffs on this rating. As an alternative, it’s a part of a sprawling historical past of anime, manga, comics, books, live-action films and exhibits, and way more, lots of which reinvent the tokusatsu hero in radically alternative ways. This explicit installment additionally focuses much more on repackaging Ultraman for a brand new era than on tapping into or increasing his current lore. On this case, its worth to the franchise isn’t additive, it’s introductory: This can be a superb, accessible place for brand spanking new and youthful viewers to step into the story, particularly in the event that they occur to be followers of inventive, dynamic animation. Longtime Ultraman followers received’t be taught something radically new right here, however they may get an ideal launch level for the following era of followers. —TR

The legacy emotions from Pixar’s Inside Out all gather around a new arrival, the orange-skinned, Muppety-looking Anxiety

Picture: Disney/Pixar

Pixar’s sequel to 2015’s Inside Out is the definition of a sequel increasing on a earlier film, typically to a fault. The primary film goes inside the pinnacle of 11-year-old Riley to discover how her personified feelings work together with one another; the sequel ages her as much as 13, introduces new emotion characters, and shoves her right into a sequence of latest, anxiety-related selections. In a whole lot of methods, it is a more-of-the-same sequel, leaning on the same “vital characters misplaced behind Riley’s mind, different characters taking on at heart stage” plot, and loads of the identical corny-to-clever puns about how acquainted ideas, feelings, or associated buildings may manifest as panorama options.

However the way in which it recognizably tells a narrative about the identical central characters, whereas specializing in how profoundly time and the occasions of the final film modified them, is uncommon for an animated sequel. (We’re side-eying you proper now, eternally-suspended-in-time Despicable Me franchise.) Inside Out 2 forwards Riley’s evolution in significant methods, even when that does increase some greater questions concerning the guidelines of this explicit world. —TR

Sam (Lupita Nyong’o) sits fearfully in a dark space, covered with dust, her cat Frodo in her lap, in Michael Sarnoski’s A Quiet Place: Day One

Photograph: Gareth Gatrell/Paramount Footage by way of Everett Assortment

You’d have to return a couple of years to Dan Trachtenberg’s Predator franchise film Prey to discover a prequel that feels as very important, participating, and significant to a movie sequence as A Quiet Place: Day One — and it’s notable that each films get to that time the identical method. They each maintain continuity with the tales they’re establishing, however neither one is attempting to dole out pointless sequence lore, or clarify issues that by no means wanted explaining: They’re each simply telling riveting motion tales in a longtime setting, and shifting focus to utterly completely different characters with their very own distinctive dynamics.

Most catastrophe films on this vein (whether or not they’re alien-invasion-focused or not) heart on survivors. Author-director ​​Michael Sarnoski tunes in on somebody who doesn’t have survival as an possibility: Sam (Lupita Nyong’o) is within the final weeks of a deadly sickness, and when killer aliens begin raining from the skies and chumming New York Metropolis and anybody in it who makes a noise, it’s barely shifting up the schedule on her mortality. Sarnoski provides her a perversely meaningless purpose — to get throughout city to her favourite pizza place and luxuriate in a last slice earlier than she dies — after which spends half the film on taut, tense alien-stalking scenes, and the remaining on exploring why she’s so doggedly decided to do that one last item earlier than she goes. The concentrate on her mixture of fatalism and obsession makes Day One an indelible story that expands the Quiet Place franchise in one of the best ways attainable, with out piling on a bunch of additional, pointless world-building. —TR

Ryan Reynolds as Deadpool/Wade Wilson and Hugh Jackman as Wolverine/Logan Deadpool and Wolverine. Deadpool has his hands pressed over his mouth humorously, while Wolverine looks tired.

Photograph: Jay Maidment/twentieth Century Studios

Deadpool’s third live-action journey, and his first beneath the Disney-Marvel Studios banner, actually earns excessive rankings for recognition: It has damaged data on its option to the highest of the field workplace. However extra considerably for the needs of this explicit rating, it pushes Deadpool’s story ahead, to the extent that something actually means something in a Deadpool film. Dying actually doesn’t. It’s attainable that MCU canon does. Narrative rigor and character continuity don’t — however who goes to a Deadpool film for these?

The snark is tamer and fewer transgressive this trip, however the Deadpool & Wolverine film continues to be bold about increasing the character’s attain into new arenas, from bringing within the Loki sequence’ Time Variance Authority as villains to letting him beg for a shot at becoming a member of the Avengers. You may actually really feel producer-star Ryan Reynolds, his co-writers, and director Shawn Levy leveraging the Deadpool franchise’s recognition to get their arms on any property they need, from gleefully defiling the top of 2017’s Logan to lining up cameos designed expressly for in-the-know comics followers. They hop round Marvel film continuity, grabbing and dropping no matter they need like nerdy magpies, and the film is extra enjoyable for it. Most franchise filmmakers may solely dream of this sort of freedom and entry. Say what you need concerning the latest movie-multiverse growth — at the least one franchise is simply utilizing it to create an even bigger, extra colourful sandbox. —TR

…Furiosa (Anya Taylor-Joy) in George Miller’s Furiosa

Picture: Warner Bros. Leisure/YouTube

Furiosa is the uncommon prequel that feels not simply equal to the hit film it’s establishing, however prefer it provides very important context reasonably than gilding the lily. Conceived and written concurrently Max Max: Fury Street so it could be in step with that movie’s story and characterization, Furiosa doesn’t unnecessarily simply fill in how-did-this-character-get-here blanks, it tells its personal distinct story and solutions questions on who Fury Street’s most compelling new character is, and why she’s Max’s equal. Extra importantly, although, it’s wildly entertaining in its personal proper. —TR

Lady Jessica (Rebecca Ferguson), cowled and with symbols written across her face in ink, stands in the desert, surrounded by similarly robed figures in Denis Villeneuve’s Dune: Part Two

Photograph: Warner Bros. Footage

The second half (or with luck, center third) of Denis Villeneuve’s Dune adaptation has a bonus no different film on this checklist has: It isn’t simply an adjunct to different films, it’s the very important continuation of an opening-act film that was largely setup, constructing to this payoff.

Even leaving apart the compelling performances and visuals, the epic warfare, and the fascinating shift in perspective — which is to say, leaving apart the truth that it’s certainly one of 2024’s finest films to this point — Dune: Half Two would high this checklist purely as a result of it’s a vital a part of its franchise’s story. It doesn’t simply contribute new issues to a franchise, it’s a cornerstone of the story Villeneuve continues to be hoping he’ll get to inform extra of sometime. —TR



Source link

Stay Connected
16,985FansLike
2,458FollowersFollow
Must Read
Related News

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here